Oh the Great Debate, TC vs CVA. First off yur not going to change anyones mind about what they like, if you drive a FORD and love FORD's then your not going to buy a Chevy.
CVA has come a long way, and they are not the old CVA with the old CVA problems, they were sold to BPI and started a new. I have owned CVA's for about 20 years and never had a problem with any of them execpt finding more room in my Freezer to put all the Venison in.
The ACCURA (old and new) have a SS Bergara Barrel, TC does,nt, not even there own SS Barrel. To me the SS Bergara Barrel is what sold me on the ACCURA, and yes it is everybit as accurate as they say, and it's a Breeze to clean. To date I can get 1/2" groups at 100yds (scoped) and 1 1/2" at 200. Is the Triumph accurate, sure, but look at the price and what you get for your money and the ACCURA beats everything about the TC but the name.
And yes I have owned a Triumph, my biggest beef with the Triumph is trying to close the action without making any noise, you have to (snap) close it. Now I dont care how good a ML is, if you cant load it and shoot it with out being quiet than it's not for me. Would you buy a BOW that everytime you drew it back it squeeked. My second beef with the Triumph is the (Tight Bore) it's not user friendly when it comes to bullet selection, some go down so hard you feel like your going to break the ramrod, the ACCURA loads with ease.
Now what I liked best about the ACCURA besides accaracy is the (Trigger Pull) it's clean and smooth, you need this to get off good shots, the Triumph's not as smooth.
Now Im not bashing TC, they make great MLers, but for what you get between the TC Triumph and CVA ACCURA, the ACCURA gets my vote.