It's wrong when they are a game management agency and their no 1 priority when timbering isn't for habitat, it's for profit. And then on top of it the PAGC is opposed to redistributing 10% of that profit back into the habitat.

Look at any stewardship timbering program and compare that to what the PAGC has done and then you tell me what's wrong with their priorities.

Their answer is take from the land- harwoods, deer, natural gas, coal, etc. Make money and put very- VERY little back.
And then do everything in their power to increase license prices. They want us to spend more but they don't want to spend anything above what they are currently spending now.

They are in financial turmoil and need $ badly. In order to survive they are going to need extra funding from somewhere. They put themselves in this situation and now we and the land are supposed to bail them out.