Originally Posted by
moosemike
I'm saying the forests in the northcentral needed to be able to recover. I was there, I saw the browse line. I saw the naked woods. It's alot different there now. The farmers in the southern portions of the state also needed some relief from too many deer.
But reducing the herd in 2G has resulted in a decrease in regeneration from 45% in 2005 to 38% in 2008. Can you explain why that happened after more than 15 years of herd reduction in 2G?