Course you ignoring the obvious undeniable facts + your continual unbased little snide remarks and jabs had nothing at all to do with the direction of the discussion.
Ha ha ha. Convenient time to "bail". I expected as much. I didnt think you could answer the questions i asked in the last post without 100% compromising your position.
(here, again, just in case you change your mind and cant resist "showing me up" lol).:
"IF its not gonna be used and permitted by pgc, why have guidelines for use? Also if its gonna be rigorously real world tested...Hows it gonna happen if its not used?"
"You are not interested in a discussion of the issue,"
And you were? By arguing the base statement of the debate and not even permitting discussion to go further? lol. Unreal.
"
You are merely attempting to dictate your agenda to the rest of us."
Yeah. Ha ha ha. Thats it. The huge majority of pa hunters who dont support the failed deer plan have a sinister agenda. Sorry pal, bet WE arent the ones pushing a deer slaughtering agenda so we can have lots of nice trillium hobblebush and extreme unnatural levels of biodiversity.
"The repeating, the declarations that your words are not debatable,"
I never said or implied that. Thats you being decietful and twisting the facts. I said that was pgcs position and that was not debatable. Hasnt got a thing to do with "my words". A fact is a fact. They support testing of gonacon and said so. Their words/actions. Not mine.
"the yelling to call attention to yourself"
You whined when i used bold. You still whined about it when i quit and was nice enough to use the quote feature because of your whining. So who is it thats unreasonable/irrational and wanting to be argumentative by STILL bringing it up yet again?
"and the general lack of substance in your posts tells us all that you have no interest in discussion and are only interested in talking at us, not with us."
you dictated the direction when you chose to be irrational, unreasonable and refusing to accept even the most basic and unquestionable of "substance". And now you're whining because you wanted MORE, when YOU wouldnt permit the discussion to proceed much past hello because your position was dashed to bits if you did??? I see. My fault. After seeing you "perform" in regards to whats "supporting" and what "isnt" despite printed proof, I wonder if a man could discuss deer with you without having to argue for 10 posts that its a mammal with four legs and hooves.
Anyway, its been swell But despite your words of wisdom pardon me if I'll NOT SUPPORT pgcs stance of supporting use of deer contraception.