"I would suggest that by criticizing this audit and calling it a sham before any word of the results has even come close to being released..."
Why would we wait when the party involved can hardly be called objective and unbiased? Its skewed from the word go.
"tells us that you apparently have a preconcieved notion as to what the results will be. That suggests a lack of fairness and open mindedness on your part."
No moreso than saying you and i are gonna make a wager for your paycheck. We are gonna see whos better looking, smarter etc. etc.. Whos gonna win?? Oh, by the way, my significant other will be doing the assessment. lol. Gee, i suppose when i am picked it will be a big surprise?? Does that make you "closed minded" if you were to decline before even getting the results? Give me a break. lol. What we will be getting is basically audit results about pgc/enviro extremist, done by ex pgc/enviro extremists and I pointed out the undeniable very strong connections.
"
What you have inadvertently done is undermine any credibilty you would hope for when it does come out and you attempt to state your case."
Credibility with me has never been an issue and thats because even though im adament about my position, i dont sink to deceit which cannot be said of many pgc supporters for the mostpart. Also, I have no case to make in regards to the audit results. Its a sham and i dont support it before even getting those results. Doesnt make much diff. though as the license fee will be granted by the legislators who are tired of all this simply because an audit was done and it makes it appear that they actually did something....So im not "making a case", as this isnt a court case to be won or lost, and dont think anything will be gained or lost by arguing against those results when they are given, though they most certainly will be argued im sure. Im just stating the facts.