Btb, why should they take the "court actions" any more seriously from Peta, than they did usp?
The usp threat of action didnt cause them to blink, even though they had reasonable concerns.... Yet they give creedence to the biggest whack jobs on the planet in peta in regards to such an extreme antihunter type subject?
I dont get it. As for "having to" i aint buying it. Not when other states want nothing to do with the stuff and couldnt give a crap less about peta.