HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Which 300 Mag ?
Thread: Which 300 Mag ?
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2009 | 10:05 AM
  #14  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by halfbakedi420
ithere it is..apples to apples in blak and white....you tellin me a hand loader cant perform results as a silly lil manufacturer load?

You said exactly that the WSM shined after 500 yards. Thats just false.

I am explaining as patiently as I can, I will and can and always do outperform factory ammo. Only load I have not been able too is my 204. I am 50-100fps behind the factory load. For the 204 hornady has a blend, I cannot duplicate.

There is a good reason why we load our own. We can try a variety of over 100 powders with various burn rates, various densities, to cater to a gun. I am explaining to you, that WSM is a hyped up cartridge that purposely was given a higher running pressure rate for advertising. Its been well documented and is well known. Only thing limiting me with pressure signs with reloading.

These tables are useless to me or most experienced loader. They are one gun with one performance. You might get 3100fps in one barrel with no pressure signs, but then can only get 3000fps in another with pressure signs. Only reliable data is one that a rifleman has for his gun with his chronograph and his gear.

Last edited by bigcountry; 10-25-2009 at 10:08 AM.
 
Reply