Whatever your position on AR's the PA information quoted above is a nominal decline at best due to a shift in the sampling emphasis that resulted in a higher sampling of pregnant does in porrer areas. The jury is still out on this one guys.
__________________
That simply is an attempt by BTB to mislead and deceive. Based on the data provided in the latest AWR, 167 does were checked in 2B and 123 were checked in 5C, while only 40 doe were checked in 2G and 67 were checked in 2F.
Furthermore, even though 2G was rated poor for forest health , it was rated the second highest for the number of embryos/doe.