Originally Posted by
WV Hunter
Honestly, I never gave it any thought really. I do see how feathers would not present as much of a barrier as vanes (especially blazers or fusions) because they would lay down. Stiff vanes will have to "force" through, so to speak.
However, I think (for hunting) in most cases is IS a trivial point, because the hole the vanes or feathers is following through a deer, is not one made by a field point - its much bigger. That is why I don't subscribe to the "thinner shafts penetrate so much better" theory. Sure in a target that is gripping the shaft they do, there is less shaft to grip and slowdown. But following a broadhead swath through an animal, I don't feel it really matters.
Many test on game animals prove this incorrect.Read some of Ashby's reports.
So through it all I've learned something that I try to tell younger fellows with higher testosterone levels than myself. Poundage, kinetic energy, momentum, speed----they are only numbers. Most don't hear me. Testosterone blocks brain function and reduces common sense.
CLASSIC