HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - how many consider
View Single Post
Old 09-12-2009 | 11:06 AM
  #16  
TFOX's Avatar
TFOX
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default

Originally Posted by WV Hunter
Honestly, I never gave it any thought really. I do see how feathers would not present as much of a barrier as vanes (especially blazers or fusions) because they would lay down. Stiff vanes will have to "force" through, so to speak.

However, I think (for hunting) in most cases is IS a trivial point, because the hole the vanes or feathers is following through a deer, is not one made by a field point - its much bigger. That is why I don't subscribe to the "thinner shafts penetrate so much better" theory. Sure in a target that is gripping the shaft they do, there is less shaft to grip and slowdown. But following a broadhead swath through an animal, I don't feel it really matters.

Many test on game animals prove this incorrect.Read some of Ashby's reports.



So through it all I've learned something that I try to tell younger fellows with higher testosterone levels than myself. Poundage, kinetic energy, momentum, speed----they are only numbers. Most don't hear me. Testosterone blocks brain function and reduces common sense.
CLASSIC

Last edited by TFOX; 09-12-2009 at 11:12 AM.
TFOX is offline  
Reply