Originally Posted by
DougE
No,and only a fool would try.If you find habitat that actually suits the deer,you'll find deer densities much higher than that,even in 2G.That's why so many people bitch about no deer.They hunt the same spots every year where they claim there's no deer.In most cases,they hunt where they can see the farthest.I see it every year.
most hunt same areas because they always have, me too. to go into another area which most likely will be just as bad hunting is not to smart also.if the deer were not overharvested like i see,there would be deer to see hunting.
5/10 years ago that is what they did.by having the big WMU we got hunters from all over coming to area i hunted for 45 years.they were only interested in killing as many doe as they could THEN MOVING ON.just like you say douge,kill deer off and move on.
now its hard to do that and we are not seeing those hunters as much now .they ruined my area i hunt and MOVED ON but now,no place to move on too.
having good habitat will not increase number of deer you see.look at SGL best habitat in world and worst hunting you will ever see.
why?like ole sproul has been saying,YOU CANT KEEP KILLING THE OVEN THAT BAKES THE PIE.
SPROUL HAS SPOKEN!!!!!!!
