Originally Posted by
Cornelius08
Maybe if you point out who said that pgc benefitted financially doug, they'll adress it? Ive reread this thread and cant find where anyone has done this.
I dont know that pgc has been paid off by anyone. Though with current levels of corruption, i wouldnt doubt it. Cant prove it, so dont use that as an argument. Dont need to with all the other blackmail and politics running deer management. Imho thats absolutely no better. Hardly makes sense dcnr would have to pay guys that are appointed and can be fired by the head of dcnr...the governor.
Sproul spouted off that it was all about money.Now if the PGC is the one setting seasons and bag limits,it only stands to reason that if this was "all about money" then the PGC would be the one's benefitting financially.I'm just asking,how so?
DCNR is benefitting because they no longer have to spend millions of dollars fencing off their timber sales.While I don't agree with DCNR's mission on everything,they've been pretty fourthright on what they want and why they wanted it.