Originally Posted by bluebird2

Because the professional deer managers,who are a lot smarter than you clearly stated results from the study did not accurately reflect the actual harvest rates. The experts also stated that the harvests in 2G reduced the herd by 11% in 2004, 5% in 2005 and 23% in 2007. That makes the score on your theories and prediction zero for 15.



If forest health was increasing in some areas, then the average forest health in 2G would have increased instead of decreasing. Apparently you are just making things up because the PGC data does not support your claims and opinions.