Those clearly show that the habitat is unit 2F is improving (24%, 34%, to 39%) and that unit 2G is still basically holding its own (42%, 42% to 38%) though it is true that there probably should be more deer harvested in the unit to reduce the probability of further habitat damag
The data also shows that forest health has decreased in 2G even though it ha the lowest DD in the state. WMU 2g has experienced the most dramatic HR ,yet it has shown no improvement in forest health. Can you explain why ?