"Without a doubt we have a lot of deer in areas where you can't hunt with a rifle. but 2A and 2B have even more yet they haven't seen the same increase in antlerless allocations. "

Unlike 2B and 5c, 2A isnt an sra, and the urban /human conflict isnt an issue, and actually had been rated as "low conflict" since the deer program began.. Reduction has also been accomplished in 2A supposedly already to desired level and the herd was supposed to have been stabilizing since 2004. (supposedly being key term since its ongoing reduction despite any claims)


Cornholio, (btw nice name, and use of my terminology as well as bold text like I use. Clearly one of the liars/frauds pgc supporters one most likely disgruntled because made him look like an idiot. My guess is "lil" racer guy or one of only 2 other known frauds and liars, utilizing another alias... anyway .. that data is from 4 years ago, and before even further reduction and also is PREHUNT density. Not the deer density most often spoken of or the one that is managed for. That would be over winter or post season deer density.


Currently not one wmu is at more than 25 ow deer per square mile. Which is the lowest goal from any of the best areas of any other state Im aware of....AND we are STILL reducing according to the annual report data.

2A has been lowered even more needlessly than areas worst in the state. Considering the cc of the unit is double to triple those areas. Any way you slice it the deer plan is a failure.