Therefore, your arguments about the number of hunters in one state verses another is just a no point argument. Deer harvests and deer management is all based on getting the correct number of deer harvested regardless of how many hunters are participating in
that harvest objective."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" ""
Hello McFly! Anybody in there? Twice as many hunters means less deer per hunter and therefore a lower per hunter success rate.
If ten people sit down at the barbecue and there's 8 burgers, someone aint gettin one! It's a simple enough principle[&:]
BTW, unless you have numbers to back up your idea that Ohio has more land with no deer, that arguement is meaningless. Oh and York may not have any deer within it's city limits wen a highly urbanized city like Pittsburgh has plenty
within it's city limitsand, yes, a substantial kill comes out of there every year. I'd bet that some live in and get hunted within the limits of York as well.
I took a minute to look at each states area and population. Ohio has 11.5 million people spread over 41, 000 square miles and Pa has 12.5 million people spread over 45,000 square miles Thats a human population difference on 2 per square mile ( 280 Ohio vs 278 for PA) so an arguement about cities being in the total of both states is totally insignificant.