ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Even the best song becomes tiresome if heard too often.
Obviously you were so quick to criticize that you didn't bother to read my post. The info presented is entirely new. In 2008 the forest health in both 2G and 2F were rated poor. Now 2F is rated fair even though regeneration is only 1% higher than 2G. It is also interesting to note than regeneration in 2F increased from 34% in 2007 to 39% in 2008,while 2G decreased from 42% in 2007 to 38% in 2008. Can you explain why it increased in 2F even though 2F has a lot more deer than 2G?