You didn't expose anything since examples are not lies. If they were you just told a whooper. In you second calculation you kept breeding rates the same when they were supposed to increase and you cut the sample size in the high breeding areas to the same size as the low breeding areas and you still only got a 2% decrease in breeding rates.

In your third calculation you doubled the sample size in the low breeding rate areas for no logical reason other than to produce the results you wanted. The fact is that the number of doe sampled in 2b and 5C are still almost double the number sampled in 2G and 2F.

So while my example was designed to reflect reality, yours was totally divorced from reality and designed to deceive and mislead.