ORIGINAL: WestVirginiaBrent
You have responded to me like3 or 4times as of late and each time you make some assanine claim followed by a bunch of conjecture. My deer is nowhere near the size of him, would hang a good 12-18 inches shorter regardless of the method and his deer easily topped 200 dressed, these are first hand witnessed facts and no amount of self proclaimed expertise you spew can really change that. I KNOW I know what the hell I'm talking about when it comes to deer and deer hunting, so far I'd say you really don't know much about anything, sorry.
them are opinions and not facts. facts havescientific proof to show they are facts. to say it goes over 200lbs is just a opinion. anyone who knows about deer or seen enough will tell you that deer is not close to 200lbs. to say it is 12 to 18 inches smaller than his deer is an opinion and bad one at that. your buck would be smaller than that 110 lb doe beside that buck. that is a fact from your statement saying your buck was 12 to 18 inches smaller than his deer. yes that doe might be closre to the camera a bit, but not enough to distort the size of it to not make a judgement about size of it compared to that buck.