HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2009 | 07:53 PM
  #67  
RSB
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

I wonder when RSB is going to post the 10 WMUs where the breeding rate decreased by 10%?

Unless you are either very dense or just once again trying mislead people you already know that the breeding rates didn’t drop in ten management units, in fact I don’t think they have dropped in any management unit over the long term though they all show variances from one year to another based on a wide range of variables.

The only reason the statewide average dropped was because of the fact the areas of the state that had the highest sample size prior to antler restrictions was also the area with the states best breeding and reproductive rates. Since antler restrictions those areas experienced declines of 65% - 91% in their sample size. That decline in those traditionally good breeding and reproductive rates sample sizes shifted the bulk of the statewide sample to the areas of the state that have always had the lowest breeding and reproductive rates. Even though the breeding and reproductive rates have increase in the traditionally poor area it still wasn’t enough to compensate for the near total collapse of the data coming from old high breeding and reproductive rates areas.

If that is too complicated for you to understand perhaps you can ask one your USP accounting buddies to explain it to you. Well I guess that might not work either since it seems they don’t get it either. Oh well, I guess logic just doesn’t work with some people.

To help me prove that logic doesn’t work with some people, how about you explaining to everyone why having more a better buck/doe ratio would result in declining breeding rates or how fewer deer and more food per deer would result in declining reproductive or breeding rates. Just explain to everyone how a person capable of logical thoughts would explain the declining breeding and reproductive rates you want to believe has occurred, if it really were anything other then a change in the sample sizes.

You should just stick to posting your nonsense when I am too busy to show everyone how far you are from reality or rational thinking. Of course I see that a number of the other posters have been doing a pretty good job of exposing you for the flim-flam artist you are, too.

R.S. Bodenhorn
RSB is offline  
Reply