Actually ALL of these experts favor a spread restriction including Gary Alt. Gary Alt characterized the point count as a less preferable but more workable compromise when instituting the, then revolutionary, changes to a state with 900,000 hunters.
If Alt preferred a spread restriction he would have tried to implement it, but he didn't. Instead he choose APRs and lied about their effects. He mis represented the results from the research done in Miss, which proved ARs caused a decrease in rack size and make ridiculous claims abot the number of buck that would be saved and how it would double or triple the number of 8 pts.
They also all agree that instituting part or thier principles are better than none as we are now doing in PA.
So are you saying that they all agree that implementing APRS which result in decreased antler size ,is a good idea?