HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - More Spin From RSB
View Single Post
Old 11-29-2008 | 11:06 AM
  #70  
Coalcracker
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default RE: More Spin From RSB

ORIGINAL: Pawildman

ORIGINAL: Coalcracker

ORIGINAL: Pawildman

ORIGINAL: Coalcracker

RSB, you seem to put yourself on the same level as these highly educated and trained professional, but the only thing we know about you is that your a WCO.

Please tell us where your four year degree is from and what you majored in, plus all the additional advanced training and sheepskins you have.

When you started working for the PGC what position did you hold and what year it was, all the advancement you had over the years until you became a WCO and how long you have now held that position. Also how many employees reported to you under each position you held.

At which position did you have to give up your security under the statecontract for workers such asPen DOT and clerical workers.

We know your postition is protecting the over400 speciesthat the PGC is responsible for, it would be nice to see how your expertize ended up being deer rather than bear or Indiana Bats.
......Hey Coalcracker.....Just what is your inference to Penn DOT and clerical workers??? Are you inferring they are some sort of sub-species in your peckiing order, or what? Are they not able to hold viable opinions also? Comments like that only serve to further alienate people to your "cause". But that's all right...just keep it up......your colors are beginning to show vividly.
It is not me but RSB who keeps talking about educated professionals and if youdon't have a degree in Biologyhe keep throwing insults about beinguneducated. Now if you are a Penn DOT worker or have a clerical position, I'm sure in RSB's eyes you are not versed in wildlife not matter how muchknowledge you have gained over time. I do know that Penn DOT workers, clerical positions and many other jobs are covered by a contract with the state, but not knowing the official name I had to use an example.

...........The fact of the matter is that once again, you speak without knowledge. You have lumped a group of people together without the first clue of what you are talking about. "One size fits all" ideaology. Talk about "blanket coverage"....Wow. Once again you have opened your mouth and inserted your foot.
I wish for you to tell us at what positions Penn DOT workers, or state workers in general have "contract coverage" with the state as you have stated.
Would you also inform us as to the points in employment with the state in general are covered by protectionism?? If any? Define it for us.
Your empty can rattles continuously once again.
What do you think I am, a contract negotiator, you ask me these stupid question when I already told you that the name of this organization was unknown to me. You should have enough sense to know that if I couldn't know the name, there is no way that I'd know the contents, if I'm rattling a can, then your head is rattling.

On the other hand if you knew what you were talking about, you would know that this organization was not created for protectionism. For your information, there was a time whenever the political party would change, many people would lose their jobs and be replaced by those of the new party. If there was any protectionism, it was to protect qualified people from politicians handing out jobs to those that worked for their election. This ends your lesson of the day. I knew a lot of good people last their jobs by both parties.


Coalcracker is offline  
Reply