I' m a Mathews Fan but I am also very logical. Advertising is advertising but if Hoyt' s claim is false as it appears to be then the adds substantiating that claim are fair and proper and responsible. If however in the bashing claim of Mathews is proven in error then Hoyt has the obligation and responsibility to refute that claim.

In the end I' ll still be a Mathews Fan . . . they work as great for me as the Hoyt' s do for their owners.