HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - stupidest regs
View Single Post
Old 09-09-2008, 12:41 PM
  #51  
GrayDawg
Fork Horn
 
GrayDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 268
Default RE: stupidest regs

ORIGINAL: GMMAT

This- in a state that has about an 8;1 doe to buck ratio (and that's a conservative estimate).
I don't see how that's even possible.
Jeff,
Believe me- it's possible.

- We have an ocean that borders 2/5th's of our state's total boundaries (so they ain't leaving or coming in that way).
- The eastern 1/3 of our state is DENSELY populated (so no hunting allowed whatsoever in ALOT of these cities/towns).
- 1/2 of our northern border is shared with a state (VT)that, for the most part,doesn't allow does to be taken (so does coming in from VT only add to our doe population).
- We have the CT River dividing the western-most 1/3rd of the state from the eastern-most 2/3rd's (this significantly keeps alot of the does on the side of the river which is substantially more densely populated & where hunting isn't allowed).

Combined withyears & yearsof theabove-mentioned "strict doe-taking limits", what do the think the result would be?

Rob
GrayDawg is offline