Let's take the archer out of the equation.

Let's use a hooter shooter. Now assuming the hooter shooter can align the sight pin housing in the peep ...NO MATTER THE "angle".....and not put torque on the string (or bow)in any direction......

How can the arrow NOT go where the pin has it for the desired distance?

Isn't the whole point of the peep to add "another" anchor reference.....or to assure the archer that he's anchoring consistantly in the same place, each time? Same can be said for the kisser, the archer's nose, the place the rest hits the side of the face, etc...?

But when it's all said and done.....these extra anchor references are designed to make sure we're aligning the sight pin housing in the peep the same way, each time. No?

I used Jawshooter for the example for a reason. He doesn't have the luxury of the aforementioned additional anchor references. If he aligns the sight pin housing in the peep the same way each time......and doesn't torque the string or the bow.......how can his arrow NOT go where it's intended to for a desired distance?

I fully understand the need for additional anchor references for consistancy.......but in a perfect shooting environment...my question still remains. If the sight housing and the peep are aligned the same way each time....how can the arrow stray?

If your contention is that it's impossible for the archer to NOT put torque on the string or the bow when not bending from the waist.....then you've introduced the human element. I'm seeking to find out the Physics behind my question.

I'm imagining aiming from a treestand at a deer 15 yds out.....and then having that deer take two steps towards the archer (on an angle), cutting the distance by 2yds. Instead of bending at the waist (which we all agree is the proper technique).....could the archer simply squat with his knees to maintain the proper angle?

There is a point to my question....