ORIGINAL: bluebird2
I challenge your claim as to what Dr Kroll said. It's either a boldface lie or another example of your clever use of two or more unrelated statements taken out of context to produce your desired result.
Here is what kroll said about ARs in his article.
Even if having size limits on bucks were management neutral activity ( meaning they didn't improve the herd), I'd still support this practice
I added the words in parenthesis.
I do not expect immediate black and white results as you claim. But when ARs reduce the average rack size after 4 years and they continue the same failed practice for 12 years with the same result ,something is definitely wrong with APRs.
Just had to enter your own words into his quote didn't you? Why did you feel the need to do that? Could it be because the rest of what he wrote demonstrated that size limits ARE a good management practice?
As for your claim that rack size has
deteriorated over the past 4 years.....
I'll let the members of this forum decide on the validity of that one!
