I didn't challenge the percentage of 2B that has trees but you have no basis for inferring how much of that forested area may or may not fall within the safety zone rules
Wrong again. I presented the data that showed only 20% of 2b was developed while 57% was forested. Based on the USFS criteria forested land does not include residences that require a safety zone..
Also, would you care to explain why if firearms hunters have less access than archers, why those hunters harvested 8,900 antlerless in 2 weeks while it took 12 weeks for archers to harvest only 5,418 antlerless?