ORIGINAL: GMMAT
BRy.....let's take my real-life scenario I have as the "example".
150 acres of mostly hardwoods and evergreens. No "attractive" bedding areas......just years and years of overgrowth (trees). The canopy is full......but the undergrowth is nearly non-existant.
Ag fields abound on the outskirts.
HOW could providing a few 1/2 acre bedding areas hurt?
I don't think it can hurt at all if it is practical and can be done. Do you think it would be better to provide a few 1/2 acre bedding areas or one larger one that is completely off limits?