ORIGINAL: bluebird2
But most won't do that.My point is still that with what you seem to think of as lousy DPSM figures, some of us are still able to fill tags regularly.
You are assuming they won't do that, but you proposed moving as a solution to the problem of low harvests, but what you proposed is not a vialable solution.
Nobody is denying that 11,700 hunters filled a tag in 2G in 2007, but in 2001 over 30, 000 hunters filled a tag in 2G. If hunters moved more and hunted harder would 2G sustain a harvest of 30 ,000 deer in 2008?
It certainly has been a viable solution for me. What someone else does is their perrogative.
As far as harvest numbers go, the antlerless lic. allocation numbers for those years are quite different, I believe, are they not?
I stated earlier on in this thread that deer numbers are not the same in 2G as they were years ago. My point that you keep missing is simply that it is still quite possible to fill your tag there with a little homework. Something a lot seem unwilling to do anymore.