HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
Old 06-01-2008, 06:35 PM
  #23  
Rory/MO
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684
Default RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?

ORIGINAL: Wingbone

Rob:
Last fall my cousin took a poor shot head on. He put the arrow through the sternum. Asa th edeer ran off he could see the arrow half protruding under the deer's chin. I helped him track it till the blood trail ran out 3/4 of a mile away. He never found it. Weeks later ther nieghbor reported seeing a deer with an arrow protruding from it's neck. From the description, it was a different deer entirely. Recently in the paper, there was a report of a deer running around with an arrow protruding from it. Wildlife officials recommended leaving it alone. Those are incidents I know about personally. Deer seem to be able to recover from a non-lethal arrow embedded in it. My concern is that carbons that won't allow the deer to break off the arrow will reduce the recovery from non-lethal hits.
your cousins fault, not the arrows he was shooting
Rory/MO is offline