ORIGINAL: Vabowman
very good point Bruce, I see what you are saying. I just don't know if defending any type of hunting is always good. I mean many of us have differing opinions about certain types of hunting, it is our right and we feel this way for a reason, we are convicted to feel this way by our consience, is that wrong? I mean that's like telling someone they are wrong for voting for a particular person, it's what they feel is best, though we may not believe it is, it is to them.
You're absolutely right. It's the way you feel. It's your opinion and you're entitled to it and you're entitled to voice it. But Bruce is right also. Let's say, hypothetically, that everyone on hereand everywhere else bashes "giraffe hunting" (sorry
) or"high fence"hunting and enough undecided folks turn the tide inpopular opinionand one of those two presently "totally legal" ways of hunting are suddenly declared illegal. Do you really not think that setting that precedent is going to make it easier to have the next "unpopular" hunting method banned? Where will the banning stop once it manages to gain a foothold?