I said this back on Page 1.
What's the premise? That they are "successful" right off the bat? Give them a season? Two?
Given the same learning curve as the original hunter is how I'm basing my point. Do I think someone could come to my woodsand do what I do(in sheer numbers) in the first season?
Nope.
The next? ABSOLUTELY. TWO years in.....no telling what they could do.
So I said this, later....
The premise of my question was.....(original)....if you HAD to shoot a P&Y deer .......where would you think your best chance of doing that was. I'd go to the placeI thought had the most of them.
I stand by this.
So I guess you're saying.......(and I don't want to put words in your mouth, Greg)
To think otherwise......is kind of like saying....."I kill more/bigger deer.....not because they're more plentiful.....or because I have better odds.......no....it's because I'm a better hunter than you".
Isn't it???
And there's nothing wrong with this POV....if you believe that.