Imagine a town meeting where this new recommedation is brought up to try and ensure hunter safety and it is met with the "We don't need anymore laws" reaction. To which the person presenting the new idea replies "You didn't say that when we presented antler restrictions".........."When a new law means you might see a bigger buck you are all for it but when it means maybe saving the life of a fellow hunter you are against it"

Yikes


Can you really say you don't want anymore legislation if you have previously voiced approval for or a want for AR's???