"Higher scoring animals only mean that genetics and nutrition are better for one area over another."?? Makes too much sense.
That sounds good in theory but that isn't true all the time either. How would it be explained that there are "mountain" bucks killed her in PA every year that go up into the 140" and 150" range. Pennsylvania isn't known for having great buck genetics and they sure as heck don't have good nutrition in the area considering there are little to no farm lands in the area.