HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - What percent of "success" is determined by "Location"
Old 07-12-2007 | 07:08 AM
  #15  
_Dan's Avatar
_Dan
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin and Canada
Default RE: What percent of "success" is determined by "Location"

First, my definition of a sucessful hunter is one who can kill mature deer on a consistent basis. Mature deer in some areas does not consist of a large rack, but an older deer. I believe when you talk about public perception you are talking about those who believe sucess is about rack size, not age. Sorry if I offend anyone, but I don't consider someone a sucessful hunter if they go out and consistently shoot young deer (under 2.5 yrs old.) Experienced maybe, but not successful.

I voted 50%. I believe you have to live where there are mature deer, but you also must have some knowledge and skills to kill them. There are mature deer everywhere. I realize that some areas hold more than others, but that has been determined by the hunters and their previous harvest practices.

So, in my eyes, location is not a state but a particular peice of property........anywhere.
_Dan is offline  
Reply