Yoter

It was the three southern commissioners that somewhat balked at the new setup when McDermott and Irby proposed it. The point is some how as they work to redefine muzzleloading hunts in the state that we someway get our feelings into the new definitions.

I really believe the commissioners are going to work on this problem with some diligence. There are two commssioneers that are willing to listen, we need to get them as much information as possible. It would really be nice if we could form some sort state inline association and get our views heard as a block of people.

I, personally, do not have a problem with both types of ML's having some sort of season. The points that we need to dispel are that modern ML's are equal to high powered centerfires and that what was an Idaho legal inline ML is hige advantage over a traditional ML. If we can get those two points across then things should change.

I, and personally again, think there is a decided advantage of a modern closed breeched, 209 shooting, scoped, ML to a Idaho legal or a traditional ML, and again the modern ML doesnot offer theadvantageous of acenterfire. I believe there is room for 2 hunts - an Idaho legal inline, including pluger type, and traditional ML'sand a modern ML during the SR season.

Now how do we get it done....