HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - How many would tag their deer if it was diseased?
Old 03-09-2007, 07:00 PM
  #7  
uncle matt
Giant Nontypical
 
uncle matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 6,744
Default RE: How many would tag their deer if it was diseased?

ORIGINAL: Hung_Bear

Your allowed to gut your deer before you tag it. When you opened it, It was spoiled and noneatable. Who would tag that deer just todrag itout of the woods to find a GC to give you a new tag?

You only had one tag and 3 days left to hunt. How many would tag it with their un-used deer tag and run off to search for a GC to replace it for you with the deer in tow?

Post a reply to your answer please.
Well that's a nice little fantasy you got there. But typically ethical, law-abidinghunters .......
1. shoot their deer
2. tag their deer
3. gut their deer

The fantasy part comes in where you shoot a deer, then get to go over it and decide if it is diseased or not (or up to your standards) and then decide if it is worthy of your tag.

That is just not how things work. Sorry - if it is diseased.........how are you gonna know looking at it? Got some little test kit or something you carry afield withyou. Very, very, very few will know by gutting it either. So it's going to be tagged.

Actually................WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS QUESTION?

Maybe it would be better to post with one of the psychic network sites.

In my world, we shoot our deer and tag them immediately afterward. If for some reason, we feel the deer is sick or something, we then just don't eat it.

POINT? [&o]
uncle matt is offline