<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>A strong dislike for the DNR and suspicions being raised by Mr. Hall may lead some to believe the DNR is "hiding" something. Comments?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>
The DNR is always hiding something!<img src=icon_smile_shock.gif border=0 align=middle> The percentage of analized results so far is a very small percentage of samples taken. I'd bet its less than 5% returned so far. Now I'm not about to go to their site and accually do the math, but I have been keeping an eye on the returns. You forgot to mention the positive from Marathon Co. up by Wausaw. That will shoot holes in the centrally located theory. I also read on another site that 3 more were found in Ill. with one being substancially away from the first. I think they already know theres some additional positives well out from the core area in my neighborhood. I also think we won't here of them until closer to the closing date of the first eradication. If they announce it now, hunting around here will come to a screeching halt. It already is almost nonexsistant. Our state would have too many of those 11 mile radius circles overlapping. They would have to make most of the state eradication zones and that would put a serious damper on license sales. I think they'll release enough info to justify massive T Zone type hunts but still try and keep hunter participation high. I also think that to keep us out in the woods, they must continue to offer free testing to those who want it. If test costs go back up to the $50. buy from Gander Mt. cost, a lot of people will just say f*** it.