ORIGINAL: Scent-Lok G.Designer
Caught up in a legal battle not related to this issue.
In all my years in labs and every study I have ever been involved with..........I have never once seen a case where results were not available.........unless they are not publishable due to bias or poor procedure. Peer review is in place for a reason.
I have worked my butt off to offer our customers the assurances they have been asking for. This is what we can offer. Sorry it doesn't fullfill you specific needs.
Don't be sorry..........I didn't expect you to be able to alter the chemical and physical properties of carbon. No one can. Please don't feel like I am singling you out or being difficult for no reason.........I just refuse to put my faith or money into a product that makes claims contrary to foundational chemistry and physics.
Also, Atlas I know you are detailed oriented guy would you really spend $250 to outfit yourself in a suit and forget to spray youre bow down? I don't think so.
That isn't the point I was making.............I didn't even say that Scent-Lok WOULD use the loopholes.........just that they COULD. Believing the language of a document that COULD result in potentially millions of dollars of incurred costs to a company is not carefully written with fuzzy language and loopholes would be very naive. I don't blame them at all, it is common pratice, I know I would do it with my business.
BTW there is no way to make a bow scent free..........unless you take it apart. The grease used to lube the limbs is one of the stronger chemical scents I have ever smelled.
Let us know if you ever untangle your legal battle.........and what journal you will be publishing your results in.