After all this time I know that one is a favorite part of the USP/Slinsky anti-PGClitany, but how are you or JS qualified to judge where, how and when SGL timber should be harvested, on the roughly one-half of the SGL acreage that evenhas marketable timber?

Aren't they essentially required to cut timber in the interest of habitat improvements...or has someone decided it's now just another exploitable asset to be used for short term income in the absense ofsufficient operating expenses?

We've already explored the ongoing pheasant programs being led by Pheasants Forever, etc. They seem to be encouraged by whatever progress is being achieved and thepromise of future involvement by the PGC as funds permit.

Do they know more than you do, or is it more important just to keep up the condemnations in the hopes of winning more converts?