ORIGINAL: atlasman
ORIGINAL: Greg / MO
Not at all. BowTech retains its top, most cutting-edge developments and design for its pro-shop-only line, and the Diamonds series utilizes a little more dated technology (maybe a year or so), and is sold through broader marketing channels. This new line you've discovered increases market share and broadens BowTech's revenue base, which can then be turned around and pumped back into the R&D pipeline.
It makes perfect sense to me.
Just like the NAAG line of bows (and PSE).......there top end stuff was found in pro shops but lower end models could be found it many sporting goods departments. I still don't see a difference.........except in response.
If you've got a problem with those who bashed NAAG's go-to-market strategy, take it up with them.
I don't have a problem with anyone.
So many people have expressed that opinion........it would be easier to count those that didn't.
What you're attempting to decry here as a bad business move (or at the very least a poor marketing strategy) is not in the least.
Re-read the thread........you must have me confused with someone else. I didn't say either one of those things.
I'll disagree with that. Mathews does make a a couple of "mid-low" range bows. That doesn't mean they don't shoot well, just means they also make a few cheaper bows.
What are they? Please name these mid-range bows mathew has made?
Yes some of there older bows have been out for awhile I would consider mid-range, but when they first come out they were top of the line. I do not shoot mathews anymore, but there decsion to stick to there line I respect. They make 1 bow line, Mathews and it is there best.