Lets see here, I'm more accurate with my encore at range now that it has a scope on it verse when it had fiber optic opens on it(which you can't have.) You can't use fiber optics so you can't be as accurate as you want in lower light agian mandated inaccuracy. A shorter wider bullet will be less stable balistically then a bullet that is long for it's diameter, so again your state mandates inaccuracy in that, and on top of that connicals are ment to be heavy and since you're forced to use a lighter connical you reduce the effective range. Sorry but it's pretty clear these rules are mandated inaccuracy.

If states want to limit these modern inlines, which I completely agree with you (even though mine has a redfield 3x9,) are very modern, they should limit it to stuff that is indead primitive and not beat arround the bush with these laws.

I did however bought my inline muzzle loader because I think it's more accurate then a shotgun so I can use it in Michigan down low where I hunt, and if people want some late season doe heard thinning I can use it then and not have to worry about ruining a stand due to failed ignition or something silly like that (Esencially if I'm freezing my rear off in a tree stand looking to put meat in the freezer I want to put meat in the freezer and not worry about the means that got me to the ends.)

Also Michigan is right to carry, class 3 weapons have just been reallowed, so basically you're a step below Texas in our weapon freedoms( or above depends which side of the fence you're on, I assume the right side .)

So would you also have archers using bare bows because they get a seperate season or is it OK they use a very modern peice of equipment, or should they be able to use there bows, but they cant use fiber sights, only have 50% let off and max 60lbs draw weight, with 2 bladed broad heads and ect ect? In the end all this rule making is rather silly and they should make the laws agree with the intent, instead of allowing some but not all technologies.