Would you agree that, DCNR, with many more biologists, forests and people on the ground to evaluate what is happening in the woods does have a clue?
Is this the reason Susan stouts made the comment that she was only seeing about 25% of the forest regenerating in desired species.
This deer removal machine started in 2000 with the Alt and Grund deer model this same model now is claimed of having some errors with data results supplied in past years.2000 the forest was claimed to be only regenerating at a rate of 20% desired species.One dry summer and congratulations folks after eliminating all these deer we could be below the 2000 20% regeneration rate.The gain for NC pa was?