HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Fat Strings, Thin Strings, etc......
View Single Post
Old 10-23-2002 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
LBR
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi USA
Default Fat Strings, Thin Strings, etc......

What is your preferance, and why? Have you shot them head to head to see if there is any real differance in performance? Noise?

I haven't done it in a long time myself, as I had come to the conclusion that there is no real benefit to using a thin string(12 strand Dacron, 10 strand Dynaflight '97, 6-9 strand 450+). I did notice more stretch, creep, and noise with the smaller strings, and less durability. My thoughts are by the time you pad out your loops, pad out and/or double serve the nock area, and/or add silencers to compensate for the extra noise, you have pretty much added back the weight you took off by reducing strands (which ain't much at all to begin with--ever weighed a strand of string?).

There might be an advantage on a light weight target bow, where every little bit counts, and string noise is not an issue--I really don't know. Has anyone noticed if compound manufacturers, who really push the speed issue, have gone to the thin strings?

Just wondering what your thoughts/opinions/experiences are.

Chad

Long Bows Rule!
LBR is offline  
Reply