I would like to add one more thing into the equation.

If we as hunters successfully eliminate one type of hunting so that another type of hunting will prosper, then we have not won anything on our part, but have essentially run the football backwards into the endzone for the opposing team (antis). That will mean one less thing they have to worry about when trying to eliminate hunting altogether.

Just something need to think about when they want to make a particular type of hunting illegal.

Marcial