HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Addressing the "small" broadhead comments
Old 08-09-2005 | 08:19 PM
  #45  
Wolf Dog
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Addressing the "small" broadhead comments

Hunter talks about big entrance holes why?
The entrance hole is not vital.
It is on the top of the animal 90% of the time from an archer.
Blood is not pumped up and out of the hole.
You might get blood to brush off on tall grass and trees.

If I take a 5 gal. Paint can in the woods and pop the top off I can walk back to my truck never dropping a spot of paint. Correct.

I can poke a pin size hole in the bottom of the bucket and get paint from the time I poked itall the way back tothe truck.

This also has not accounted for spray blood for the mouth of the animal because the lungs are cut 1/2.

I thing the larger the blade the better IMO.
But you need 100% accuracy with the large baldes.
Not small blades x 3-4

Aslice from a 10 gauge size hole or 3 cuts or 4 or 6 or 10 cuts it is still a 10 gauge size hole

I want a 2 inch or 4 inch bomb going off inside the game.

Think about it if we could pull and shoot 150# draw and a 7 inch head we would.
not talking away from 50# and 1 1/8 cut blades


But more power and more damage only make thing fall faster.

22 short cal. 50gr = 510 nitro cal 500gr.
If you had to pick 1 to save your life it would not be the 22.



Wolf Dog is offline  
Reply