HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - How the .243 stacks up
View Single Post
Old 06-06-2005 | 06:56 PM
  #132  
48thguns
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: How the .243 stacks up

ORIGINAL: zac76156

zrexpilot,

Did you read the article that CZ2506 posted??? If not heres the link again http://www.xmission.com/~fractil/math/kp.html#test It will go along way into explaining how bullet weight and diameter affect terminal performance. I am no opponent of the .243 (have killed several nice size whitetail with one) but to suggest the .243 as an elk cartridge is ridiculous...
Within 200 yards, the 243 is a decent elk rifle.....95gr nosler....no problem.....how much '/lbs energy you want.....100 megaton nuke??? this thread is rediculous. I read every single post and am addled....as usual. 90% of all deer/elk are killed less than 200 yards....so what's the big deal?? Put the bullet where it's supposed to go and a 220 Swiift is fine. Of course in this day in age, all the macho types want a 600 Gibbs nitro express.....whatever. Regards, Bluestar......had some laughs with this one.
48thguns is offline  
Reply