Now guys dont get this wrong you know were I stand. I just read the artical and to me it is not that bad, yes they still kill animals but the animals they are killing are most likely strayes and would probable starve to death on the streets if they didnt kill them. By no means am I tacking there side, but dont get caught up in something just because who ever wrote it wanted ya to. Claming that they kill those animals just for the sake of killing is just like saying hunters kill just for the the kill. We all know there is much more to it then that, and there is much more behing the artical then the auther put forth. I know they wouldnt do that for us but someone has to see the middle ground why not let it be us. If these people could only see who we realy are and not the stereotype that they put on us they would see that we are on the side of the animals, there is nothing that scares me more then the thought of loosing deer, fish, and any other animal to extinction. If we only had the funds they had how much good could we do.

Latter guys and I hope ya dont take this the wrong way, just remember what the auther of that artical did was no different then the spin they put on the stories they write about us, the only difference is he is on our side.