Can't decide between the Burris Fullfield II and the Nikon Omega Monarch.I've read so many reviews on both that I honestly can't make up my mind.I like the fact the Nikon is designed formuzzleloaders, but does that really matter that much? The Burris comes with a free spotting scope, but I've already got excellent binocs so that isn'ta really big deal tome. What do youexperts recommend? Burris or Nikon? Thanks!!!!
__________________
For competitve rates on outfitter, hunt club or contractors insurance, feel free to contact me.
RE: Down to 2 Scopes...What goes on my TC Triumph?
A lot of folks have good things to say about the Omega on their muzzleloaders, and they should have better glass than the Burris. I'm pretty sure the Omega is what I'm soon going to buy. The additional eye relief in combination with the reticle made for muzzleloaders sounds good to me
RE: Down to 2 Scopes...What goes on my TC Triumph?
I like the Nikon over the Burris. The BDC reticle does take a little guess work out but like all BDC type reticles dont take things for granted, go out and shoot your gun/load combination to see where it shoots according to the different circle/aim points. Good luck in your BP hunting!
__________________
Life is good, Give God the Glory....doubleA
There is a reason it comes with a free spotting scope. Nikon Omega has the BDC which will come more in hand then a spotting scope. Nikon Omega has better glass quality then Burris.
RE: Down to 2 Scopes...What goes on my TC Triumph?
Don't disregard bushnell just because of the name... Take a look at the Elite 3200's and 4200's depending on what you want to spend. They are very high quality.
Down to 2 Scopes...What goes on my TC Triumph?
