Wildlife Management / Food Plots This forum is about all wildlife management including deer, food plots, land management, predators etc.

how to tell a 3.5 from a 4.5?????

Old 10-28-2011, 09:47 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 86
Default how to tell a 3.5 from a 4.5?????

On our lease here in southern Indiana we just uped the ante and moved from any 140" or any 4.5 year old whitetail buck, to has to be atleast a 4.5 year old!!! My question is what is the easiest way to tell the difference between a 3.5 and a 4.5?
shaner72 is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 04:34 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,926
Default With modern technology

those trail cam manufacturers are going to have to present the age of the deer, when its picture is taken on the trail cam. They can put it right next to the time.

And making up a rule is sometimes a lot easier than understanding it.
Valentine is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 02:51 PM
  #3  
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 48
Default

At 3.5 the legs are still long and lanky looking, their body starts to fill out at 3.5 and they are very fit looking deer. The separation of neck and shoulder is very visible as the neck of a 3.5 is muscular but still thin looking. 3.5 y/o deer often are mistaken as mature for the simple fact of 'he looked muscular and fit'. 4.5 y/o deer appear to have short legs and a thick body, the neck becomes very muscular and the line between the neck and shoulder tends to disappear. The belly is rounding still tight though. Also the back is still straight and strong looking. Square and chiseled body. At 5.5 the deer is a year from peak antler growth. The legs are short and very thick looking, and the obvious sag in the belly and drop in the spine. Also the eyes get small and narrow. They have reached their potential body muscle at 5.5. hope this helps
AP HD_Jake is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 05:28 AM
  #4  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge Ohio USA
Posts: 744
Default

The fact is it’ll be extremely difficult to tell in a hunting situation, and many times it will just be impossible. To be honest, it sounds like a poor rule. Good intentions, but few people can tell the difference. Even biologists don’t get it right every time, and that’s with plenty of time to look a deer over. Who’s going to verify every deer, and how? Why change the rule if you aren’t sure yourself?

Last edited by M.Magis; 10-31-2011 at 05:30 AM.
M.Magis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.