HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Whitetail Deer Hunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/whitetail-deer-hunting-4/)
-   -   Choices? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/whitetail-deer-hunting/91513-choices.html)

timbercruiser 02-22-2005 04:36 PM

Choices?
 
Some very good land transactions are finally about to close. I need to chose between the top Swarovski, Zeiss and Schmidt Bender scopes. Anybody have a knowledgeable preference? Low light is the main criteria. I'm leaning to the Schmidt Bender.

one on one 02-22-2005 05:43 PM

RE: Choices?
 
good luck with your choice,too expensive for me.

i shoot stuff 02-22-2005 06:00 PM

RE: Choices?
 
i hear alot of good things about zeiss and swarvoski

thndrchiken 02-22-2005 07:25 PM

RE: Choices?
 
For your shopping list it don't matter. Paying that much for glass is just a vulgar display of more money than you know what to do with. All of what you mentioned are top of the line and of the highest quality.

timbercruiser 02-22-2005 08:29 PM

RE: Choices?
 
Thunderchicken I'm 53 years old and have worked hard for my money. Nothing vulgar about treating yourself to a quality scope in my opinion. I will probably mount it on my 35 year old rifle.

North Texan 02-22-2005 09:00 PM

RE: Choices?
 
Swarovski all the way. IMHO, they have the best quality optics money can buy. Their tech support was also great when I had problems with my binoculars. They sent me an extra eyecup no charge, but the lady I talked to on the phone told me how to fix them. Nothing wrong with the binoculars except the operator.[&:]


. . . I'm 53 years old and have worked hard for my money. Nothing vulgar about treating yourself to a quality scope in my opinion.
You'll get no argument from me. Nothing wrong with wanting the best.

Slamfire 02-22-2005 09:51 PM

RE: Choices?
 
Get the one with the best definition. Sight on an airconditioning unit on top a building and see which one show the fire mesh screen.

crzy_hunter89 02-23-2005 04:51 AM

RE: Choices?
 
swarovski is the best choice. They have an excellent coating on their lenses and have a extremely high quality process in which they use to make these lenses. I would go with swarovski.

lhook7 02-23-2005 08:40 AM

RE: Choices?
 
I went with the Zeiss 4.5 X 14 mostly on the basis of cost. I had a pair of Zeiss 10 X 42 binoculars, but sold them before last season and got a set of 15 X 56 Swarovski binoculars. I think the Swarovskis have better optical clarity, but I decided to stay with the zeiss scope because I can make my decision as to whether a buck is a shooter with the binoculars. The zeiss scope is great in low light, so I can be confident of taking a shot at any time during legal shooting hours, the image is just not as crisp and clear as the Swarovskis.

Sniper151 02-23-2005 11:21 AM

RE: Choices?
 
Suggestion, check out the Leupold LPS. Superior quality and warranty. I have owned a Swarovski PH series and in my opinion the LPS is more crisp and clear, especially in fog and low light conditions.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.